Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Romero

SA:MP M:RP Helper
  • Content Count

    55
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

29 Neutral

About Romero

  • Birthday December 13

Personal Information

  • Location
    Serbia
  • Discord
    Dusko#9092

Server accounts

  • [SA:MP] Mudoo Roleplay
    Romero_Quijada

Recent Profile Visitors

135 profile views
  1. I'll just say that you're also responsible for your actions. If someone told you to jump off the cliff, I doubt you'd do it? So, if you're a police officer as a volunteer, with some common sense, you're not supposed to shoot suspects like that, especially those that are already cuffed, just because someone told you to. Mike Kelly was ordered to shoot at the FBI agents by "higher-ups". He got banned for DMing, and he served his punishment 'cause of it (as a reference). You didn't face any server, nor PD punishments, so are you still going to bump this thread expecting something else, or just move on like everyone else?
  2. I kinda have to agree with this. Seeing 10 people at the same place doesn't mean there's a crime going on.
  3. We both see the issue from the other perspective. You go into battle knowing there will be 8 groups there. We go into battle knowing there's whole PD, SWAT and HRT waiting for us around the corner. This can't be solved simply by telling people not to do it. Both of the sides have to address the issue and work on fixing it (if they're willing to, at least).
  4. Ok, let's see... 1) Re-read what the suggestion says. 2) It's not normal seeing a whole SWAT team chasing down some gang members or a few immigrants. SWAT is made for people that don't know how to RP I suppose, since I never saw them RP-ing. Maybe they are, between themselves in that 8K HP Bunker while db'ing others, but I wouldn't know. 3) Everyone has the option to RP towards the end that they would prefer, if it's possible in the situation. You've never seen a patient dying on the helpers hands? Especially if they just ate few kilos of bullets? 4) If you seriously think that they're not doing that, you're either blind, lying or trolling. It goes to the point where's it's a publicly known thing. Don't know how you missed it. 5) The main reason behind Criminals helping one another is because PD used to bring whole SWAT & HRT teams with Bunkers and HW to help with a "simple traffic stop". It's just 1 panic button away. 6) I'm still trying to make a proper suggestion that would cover all the sides, with an unbiased solution. You're free to add something useful, like a solution to some of these points in the thread, 'cause this didn't contribute much.
  5. The only way to force someone to create a roleplay scenario is to threaten with some punishments. Killing someone 'cause he told you "fuck off" is considered as a rulebreak and should be enforced more. Shooting someone will result in an active suspect situation that will lead to a shootout with cops. Instead, make a brawl fight, loser does /lay and cries. If he pulls a gun out while down, the first person will shoot him, and when the cops come, he can RP an investigation with them (Just an example). Then he can take his case to the court, etc. (( I'll make a suggestion soon on the respective board with some changes to the court system in-game, hope that it'll make it more interesting than it is now. Investigations were done by police officers so far inside the PD which is why people argue about them being biased etc. ))
  6. As we can all see some of the player actions are getting repetitive with generally no response, or at least not the one players would want, I've decided to list some of the changes that all of the players would benefit. (Points were already discussed in some of the private chats from various parties to create the most unbiased version of it.) 1) Punishing should be maintained and upheld. There's no point in punishing someone when he's going to rejoin and continue doing the same thing over and over again. Blacklisting should be taken more seriously to avoid that from happening. There should be a discussion if the player should be removed from the blacklist in certain cases, with valid arguments from the authorities. 2) Members, especially supervisors of the department & Tactical operation teams (SWAT) must be able to differentiate between groups, and individualize their approach to each group. Each group has a certain playstyle that differentiates one from another, so members of the Departments must be able to take measures depending on each groups actions. Sending a tank at a few gang members is not something that should become a practice. Police force has enough departments to take actions against every group individually (depending on it's type). 3) Players must prioritize roleplaying and not always be driven by the need to end situations with either a shootout or jailing. Ending them with a unique roleplay is preferred. Pretty self-explanatory, but jailing or a shootout isn't always the answer. Work towards building a roleplay scenario that wouldn't last less than a minute when someone gets shot. Be creative. 4) There should be no camping, baiting and such activities where the officers would instigate the groups to do something that would result in a jail or a shootout. Also self-explanatory, officers are supposed to do patrols in order to find active suspects, or to try and find ongoin criminal activity. Provoking in order to get a response from a criminal group should be punished same as the "Cop baiting" rule. 5) Criminal groups should roleplay as the type of group they chose. Mafias are supposed to do their job discreetly, away from any witnesses while holding a legal business as a cover. Gang members are supposed to create riots, steal cars, rob houses, defend their 'turf' where they hang out. Recently, you can see them planting flowers. Cops shouldn't turn situations such as dealing with a few gang members into a Mass DM with a simple panic button. 6) Deal with situations depending on their type (IC/OOC) A lot of situatuons were taken OOCly (as a recent PD/FBI situation) where people could have taken the whole situation ICly after gathering enough proofs. Court still exists and it's doing it's role well as far as I know. Cop shooting suspects randomly is not a corrupted cop, it's deathmatching and should be treated respectively. (( Thread is to be edited if needed to add/remove/change certain aspects of the points. Reply only with your opinion on these matters while maintaining respect towards other people's opinion. You're free to add any other suggestion related to the matter in a constructive manner [logical, unbiased suggestion that wouldn't contain any bashing towards others]. Any post that contains any other response will be taken down on my request )).
  7. Officer Audrey Riley was seen murdering a suspect that was cuffed and knocked down by a witness. The situation was reported to the authorities and an action was taken. What's OOC in that, Elias? The part where the officer insulted the suspect (due to some OOC hate I suppose) for quite some time, or the part where the officer put a bullet in his head? Everything was kept IC and that was the result. Unfortunately, in this situation, you can't jail an FBI Director for yelling "Kill him", right? Yet, an officer was caught inbetween the 2 sides (FBI & LSPD). As I've seen, the player still works at the Department, so I suppose he didn't recieve any severe punishments. With that excluded, the only thing left is the shitty relationship between the 2 groups, which should definitely be settled between yourselves. Stop throwing shit at eachother or you'll both leave some of it on your hands. Regarding the actions of the FBI agents, they should say they fucked up and move on. Even though they were off duty, masked and driving an unmarked vehicle doesn't mean they're no longer FBI agents as their characters and that they're allowed to behave like animals. Telling a PD Volunteer to shoot someone is beyond unrealistic. But ofcourse, no one would bother getting some evidence, observations, investigations and report him to the higher ones? Yeah, just create an OOC board where you can cry how fucked up you all are. Peace.
  8. Romero

    ~Problem~

    Before y'all start arguing about who did what and create another drama here for no reason... Just take a look at what he said. "before the award show i tried to make good memes and make people happy some time in their life, but the end i was not the funniest player, who ever was good work to him, i just want this community to be a less-toxic community since, ive been toxic alot i apologise about it, but the other also have to be less toxic." You have to start working on yourself, then the others might treat you the way you deserve. "You should have seen what saman did in pd wt" Maybe you should stop looking at what others are doing and look at yourself. Figuring out what's wrong is half the solution, fixing those points is the rest of it. Cheers and good luck. Fucking hypocrites.
  9. So basically, you're saying I got DM'd but no one wanted to take my case since it was classified as IC issue? Oh yeah, it's not DM, he's just a corrupted cop, right?
  10. I agree that players in gangs lack a bit of... discretion. But also, let's imagine a scenario: > Gang member discreetly tells the cop he's not welcome there. > Cop counts that as a threat, and by IC regulation, he's allowed to shoot him down. I never was a part of the PD nor I know their regulations from A to Z, but a couple of days ago, I got shot down 'because I was a potential threat' (possibly armed, with possible intention of assaulting a police officer). They 'are not supposed to shoot, but they're still allowed'. Counted as IC issue. Not defending gangs now, they still have a lot of points to improve, but try to cover all the aspects here.
  11. You people lack perspective. Mafia is supposed to do it's business silently, away from the eyes of the police department. But Ballas are not a mafia. They are a street gang. Their members are supposed to rob people, break into houses, steal cars, chase down people in their hood, create riots, or whatever A GANG MEMBER is supposed to do. They're supposed to create chaos, and threaten the cops when they are around (while trying to follow the server rules though). I'm not sure why are you expecting to get a cookie or something there. It's just a death wish, and you know it.
  12. Romero

    Imbalance

    I was arrested by BCR numerous times after getting caught ATM nuking in BC, lost a shitload of marked money, C4s and other items. They RP'd well as law enforcers, and everything that goes with it and I respect that. I was also executed by Carlo himself after he came to Idlewood to collect the tax which we refused. Everything was RP'd properly and I respect that as well. But considering group owners aren't playing as regularly as they did before and only lvl 1 members play around nowadays, we get the situation where 60 people meet to talk (great opportunity for a mass RP), but it ends up as a mass DM instead when they do [/me tackles the Romero, fails, /s hands up or die nigga]. I personally feel like Gambino's shouldn't close, just give the power to someone that can actually show these guys what to do on the level that Gambino family represents (as the oldest group in Mudoo). Same goes to others.
  13. What is your in-game name? Romero_Quijada Which player(s) do you want to report? Alexander_Pearson When did the rulebreak happen? 06/27/2020 Which players did witness the rulebreak happening? Young_thug (their friend I suppose) What happened? (quote what rule was broken) Deathmatching / Poor RP I was chilling on my roof, while talking through wt. Suddenly 3 guys approach, and create the most bullshit scenario possible. (more info in Evidence section) The guy who did it was banned for ban evading (vatos_locos) But this guy also took the part in this. Reason why I'm making this report is because the player is level 21 ingame. It's just unacceptable. Evidence [03:48:06] vatos Iocos says: hi ese [03:48:10] vatos Iocos says: give me money bro [03:48:11] Alexander Pearson says [Drunk accent]: hi ese [03:48:15] vatos Iocos says: PLEASE DONT ROB ME (here, he put his handsup) [03:48:19] vatos Iocos shouts: SIR HE'S ROBBING ME! [03:48:19] vatos Iocos shouts: SIR HE'S ROBBING ME! [03:48:19] vatos Iocos shouts: SIR HE'S ROBBING ME! [03:48:20] vatos Iocos shouts: HELP! [03:48:23] Alexander Pearson says [Drunk accent]: wtf [03:48:24] Alexander Pearson says [Drunk accent]: ay [03:48:27] Alexander Pearson says [Drunk accent]: why you robbing him [03:48:28] vatos Iocos says: PLEASE DONT ROB ME [03:48:29] vatos Iocos says: BRO HELP ME [03:48:29] (( Romero_Quijada: Why are you trolling? )) [03:48:31] vatos Iocos says: HELP ME PLEASE [03:48:34] vatos Iocos says: HELP ME BROOOOO [03:48:36] vatos Iocos says: HELP ME HE'S ROBBING ME [03:48:38] vatos Iocos says: BRUH [03:48:38] (( Alexander_Pearson: its not troll )) [03:48:43] (( vatos_Iocos: bro we're rping )) [03:48:47] (( Alexander_Pearson: ye )) [03:48:47] (( vatos_Iocos: you juts robbed me bro im level 0 )) [03:48:48] (( Romero_Quijada: this is rping? )) [03:48:51] (( Alexander_Pearson: ye )) [03:48:56] (( vatos_Iocos: bro you're robbing me )) [03:48:56] (( Romero_Quijada: are you on crack or smth? )) [03:49:00] (( vatos_Iocos: and my friend came )) [03:49:02] * vatos Iocos kills the robber (he ran behind me and knifed me) [03:49:03] You have suffered severe injuries and passed out. [03:49:03] After 120 seconds, you can "/accept death" if you wish to give up on life.
  14. Just let me drive that shi' offroad, easy win.
  15. I don't see the need of hating around. If you found yourself in this subject, post a counter-argument (if you have any). If you're not a part of this subject, post your opinion in a constructive manner. If you have nothing important to add and you're here just to drop salt, stay out of it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By continuing you automatically agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy terms.